We left our readers in mid-air, so to speak, trying to decide which airline to use, based on its safety standards. Should s/he use the government-approved airline with minimal standards (basic standards which will (probably) work (most of the time)), but perhaps too often will fail? It also uses certain parts that some aviation experts believe are actually substandard. However, it is definitely the most inexpensive airline, and because their standards are more relaxed, they are able to fly to more places more frequently, as they can have more planes and more crew available, thus making air travel more available to all. Yet there is a segment of the flying public who would not use this airline no matter which government agency approved it. Remember the Versailles Hall collapse?
By Rabbi Chaim Malinowitz - with permission from ’Chadash’ Beit Shemesh Weekly
Or, should s/he go with MEHADRIN AIRLINES, which has higher safety standards? The system is less likely to malfunction, and if there is indeed a breakdown, it is far less frequent. Plus, they try to use only parts that are sound according to all shitos, whoops, excuse me, all aviation experts; their standards for their pilots are higher. But, their prices are higher, too, and they don’t fly as often, nor to as many places.
Or, should s/he use MEHADRIN MIN HAMEHADRIN AIRLINES, which aims for the high end of the fear-of-flying market, has even higher standards, higher prices, and less availability—but you feel more secure.
(The SUPER MEHADRIN AIRLINE [“We do chumros you have never even heard of’!”] is defunct, a victim of not being able to convince anyone of the necessity for it.)
My good friends: Just about any complex manufactured or mass-produced item you can think of is enormously more complicated than you realize. Food, Tefillin, a mezuzah, a mikveh—all involve hundreds of steps in a process leading up to the final product. And all along the way there are different opinions how to do things, and different end results. More expensive, less expensive; more likely to be acceptable, less likely; more likely to be durable and to consistently result in a satisfactory product, less likely; more likely to be available whenever you want it, less likely……
Do you like chicken? Let’s visit the slaughterhouse and take a peek…
1) Chickens receive various injections. If an injection is in the neck, legs, or breast, it must be ascertained that it did not become a tereifa (injured in a way that it is becomes non-kosher, even if slaughtered properly). Mehadrin shechitos send a mashgiach down to observe where the injections are made. Non-mehadrin, to my knowledge, do not.
2) How the chickens are loaded, caged and transported can sometimes render them treif. Mehadrin shechitos take steps to ensure that that does not happen.
3) Shechita knives have to be sharp and smooth for the shechita to be valid. Can they be 100 hundred percent smooth and sharp? Probably not. So at what point do you stop using one? Mehadrin has higher standards, and the mashgichim are more careful in their checking (everything is slower; there are less chickens coming down the pipeline).
4) The less frequently the knife is checked, the greater the quantity of chickens at “risk”(you thought only children were at risk?), since if the knife is not good, all those chickens slaughtered since the last valid checking are not good. What actually occurs is that the knife decreases in quality over time; the more frequently you check, the quicker a deteriorating knife gets pulled. (Mehadrin shittos check the knife after around every 20 chickens; with non-mehadrin, this can be as many as after 100 chickens.)
5) One is supposed to initially slaughter both the esophagus and windpipe for the shechita of a chicken. After the fact, even just one pipe cut is kosher. Very often, in many shechitos, just one pipe is cut. (There is no question that either way, the chicken is kosher. But there is a way that you are supposed to do it. Do you care? Should you care? It slows down the process, that’s for sure!)
6) How experienced is the whole crew? Are they fresh from shochet school, or do they have years of experience? How about the mashgichim, who are looking over for tereifos, checking the salting?
7) How many chickens get slaughtered by one shochet per minute? Twelve? That means one every five seconds. The non-mehadrin have between 15 and 20! Now, there’s not only one shochet. Non-mehadrin have many more shochtim than mehadrin; they can have five shochtim, and the system (cleaning, salting, checking for tereifos) might have to deal with 100 chickens a minute! Think about that! Let’s even say that 72 chickens are done in a minute (18 times four). Mehadrin rarely has more than 36 a minute (12 times three).
Skipping the gory details of if and how a chicken is examined for tereifos, do you realize what it means when statistics show that mehadrin runs find between one and two percent tereifos, and non-mehadrin find half of a percent? And we’re talking real tereifos according to all opinions.
9) Blood has to be cleaned off the chicken before it is salted. How completely is the job done? Is the chicken even opened to allow for a thorough cleaning inside? Are there parts of the chicken left inside the hollow when it is being salted?
10) Are they careful to soak it for a half-hour before the salting? Is the water perhaps too cold, which is a problem according to Rabbi Akiva Eiger? (The vets want it as cold as possible.)
11) Is there a mashgiach making sure it was cleaned well before being salted? Is there a mashgiach making sure the salt is spread all over? Check above to see how many chickens are coming down the line! Does the salt indeed stay for an hour? How is the salt washed off? Maybe the water they put it in itself gets awfully salty after a while, which is problematic? (Mehadrin will spray the chicken with water first, before this soaking.)
Is a mehadrin shechita perfect? No. Does every mehadrin shechita do everything I’ve mentioned, and perfectly? No. Do non-mehadrin shechitas do nothing?
What are the chances we have all eaten non-kosher at some point in time? If you think about it, and visit a slaughterhouse, there is no question in my mind that you will seriously consider hiring your own shochet and bodek. But the difference between mehadrin and non-mehadrin is huge (in slaughtering and koshering). (Rabbi Malinowitz is rav of Beis Tefillah Yonah Avrohom in Ramat Beit Shemsh Alef)

This entire article is complete hyperbole. There are no facts at all, (other than if you count very general numbers which I’m sure vary between one rabbanut and another).
Rabbi, we appreciate the service that you’d like to provide, letting us know the difference between M and NM hashgachot, but you haven’t done that here.
regarding the first item, injections: injections are given by vets. The Shulhan Aruch paskens that we believe an expert in this matter if he says “I did it correctly”.
Secondly the manner in which the injections are given - under the skin using an extremely short needle, makes treifing up a chicken virtually impossible.
so if the mehadrin agencies do send a supervisor for this matter - it doesn’t make a bit of difference because is simply not needed.
FROM A READER:
Hi Yechiel,
A nice attempt to explain mehadrin by the Rabbi.
I just wonder why we are not so analytic when it comes to
Dina demalchsa-taxes-Jay walking etc. etc.etc.
Keep well,
When I read this I was quite upset, so I was glad to see some of the other comments.
The analogy is terrible, no mashal, nimshal or anything else relevant. (Of course the bad airline if a government one.) The article is hyperbole in order to scare people. If the “regular” is SO bad that people are eating mamash treif, then work to fix the system — setting up your own parallel exclusive system is against halacha.
If you’re worried about where the injection is given rather what is being given, that you are consuming, then you’re probably eating treif. And if you do not object to the factory farm methods, then you are certainly eating treif. These animals wouldn’t survive even a short period of time without all of these things. haShem didn’t allow the eating of meat in order for us to treat them in this way.
The article itself says, “Skipping the gory details”. That’s really the problem, “I don’t care what happens to the raising of the animal; that has nothing to do with the halacha”. Start demanding humane breeding instead of ignoring what is convenient for you.
my son in-law the shochet says that the ONLY difference between their regular and mehadrin shechita is the frequency of knife checks- 30 vs 60.
either way it’s 10 chickens per minute, 30 minutes soak, one hour salt .
treifa rate is a steady 1.5 % either way. when it’s mehadrin label another mashgiach is present to ensure that at all times there will be someone off to the side smoking
Previous part, part 1:
http://www.jerusalemkoshernews.com/2010/06/just-what-are-mehadrin-standards-part-1-of-6/
I think that in all of the issues mentioned above, it is important to know which practices are based on real opinions in the halacha and which are not. In other words, are these practices coming to take care of a real problem? For example, many people eat glatt meat only because the Beit Yosef rules that non-glatt is treif. The Rema paskens the qula, but many don’t want to rely on that leniency. So in that issue, the practice address a real problem.
If in the list above, these practices (like have a supervisor watch the injections) don’t have any meaning, then there is no reason for anyone to be machmir and spend the extra money for what is really nothing.
FROM A READER:
The frequency of checking the knife is strictly a statistics problem and has nothing to do with higher standards of kashrus. From this description, either way, all chickens after the last check are suspect and can’t be marked as kosher until the next check. If the production system doesn’t allow for marking the starting point of a current run, then that is a real supervisory problem. So the real risk is to the producer, not to the consumer.