<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Report: Chief Rabbinate Schita Abroad</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jerusalemkoshernews.com/2009/08/report-chief-rabbinate-schita-abroad/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jerusalemkoshernews.com/2009/08/report-chief-rabbinate-schita-abroad/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=report-chief-rabbinate-schita-abroad</link>
	<description>Reporting on Kashrus in Eretz Yisrael</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 May 2012 13:36:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pith from Pinhas</title>
		<link>http://www.jerusalemkoshernews.com/2009/08/report-chief-rabbinate-schita-abroad/comment-page-1/#comment-202</link>
		<dc:creator>Pith from Pinhas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 15:59:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jerusalemkoshernews.com/?p=919#comment-202</guid>
		<description>I have followed your progress for the past month or two and have found your articles worthy of the highest praise.  The effort you put into this work is mind boggling.  However, you have here provided a tremendously long article which dwarfs your partial translation of the rebuttal (itself running to two full pages in the original Hebrew) from the Rabbinate at the end without explaining to the uninitiated that media such as Ynet are largely in business to create scandal, and if it is scandal which makes Rabbis, any Rabbis, look bad, so much the better.  You also failed to translate the bit about the Courts (no friends of Rabbis themselves) having thrown out the claims of these guys on more than one occasion.  Personally I have no idea who is right here but if I must choose between Ynet and duly accredited Rabbis I know which I prefer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have followed your progress for the past month or two and have found your articles worthy of the highest praise.  The effort you put into this work is mind boggling.  However, you have here provided a tremendously long article which dwarfs your partial translation of the rebuttal (itself running to two full pages in the original Hebrew) from the Rabbinate at the end without explaining to the uninitiated that media such as Ynet are largely in business to create scandal, and if it is scandal which makes Rabbis, any Rabbis, look bad, so much the better.  You also failed to translate the bit about the Courts (no friends of Rabbis themselves) having thrown out the claims of these guys on more than one occasion.  Personally I have no idea who is right here but if I must choose between Ynet and duly accredited Rabbis I know which I prefer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

